"Ambition intoxicates more than fame; desire makes all things blossom, and possession makes them whither away; it is better to dream your life than to live it, even though living it is still dreaming it, albeit less mysteriously and less clearly, in a dark, heavy dream, like the dream diffused though the dim awareness of ruminating beasts. Shakespeare's plays are more beautiful when viewed in a study than when put on in the theater. The poets who have created imperishable women in love have often only ever known humdrum servant girls from taverns, while the most envied voluptuaries are unable to grasp fully the life they lead, or rather the life that leads them.
I knew a young boy of ten, of sickly disposition and precocious imagination, who had developed a purely cerebral love for an older girl. He would stay at his window for hours on end to see her walk by, wept if he didn't see her, wept even more if he did. He spent moments with her that were very few and far between. He stopped sleeping and eating. One day, he threw himself out of his window. People thought at first that despair at never getting close to his lady friend had filled him with the resolve to die. They learnt that, on the contrary, he had just had a long conversation with her: she had been extremely nice to him. Then people supposed that he had renounced the insipid days he still had to live, after this intoxication that he might never be able to experience again. Frequent remarks he had previously made to one of his friends finally led people to deduce that he was filled with disappointment every time he saw the sovereign lady of his dreams; but as soon as she had left, his fertile imagination restored all her power to the absent girl, and he would start to long her her again. After that final interview in which he had, in his already active and inventive fantasy, raised his lady friend to the high perfection of which her own nature was capable, and been filled with despair when he compared that imperfect perfection to the absolute perfection on which he lived and from which he was dying, he threw himself out of the window. Subsequently, having been reduced to idiocy, he lived for a long time, since his fall had left him with no memory of his soul, his mind, or of the words of his lady friend, whom he now met without seeing her. In spite of supplications and threats, she married him, and died several years later, without having managed to make him recognize her.
Life is like this girl. We dream of it, and we love what we have dreamt up. We must not try to live it: we throw ourselves, like that boy, into a state of stupidity--but not all at once: everything in life deteriorates by imperceptible degrees. Within ten years, we do not recognise our dreams, we deny them, we live, like an ox, for the grass we graze on moment by moment. And from our marriage with death, who knows if we will arise as conscious, immortal beings?"
~Marcel Proust
(from Pleasures and Days: Nostalgia - Daydreams Under Changing Skies, part 6)
I see so much of myself in Proust. Not always the best parts of me, but real parts of me none-the-less. Like Proust, I'm a perpetual dreamer, highly introspective, and I often prefer the company of the characters in my head to that of real people. What I find interesting, is that in spite of this common tendency, Proust and I seem to have very different opinions about how it affects our lives. While I am constantly pushing myself to spend less time alone, to go out among real people and have real life experiences, Proust extols the world of dreams. Numerous times throughout Pleasures and Days, he claims the imagination's superiority over travel, over conversation, over performances and concerts, over all of life's experiences--just as here, he claims the superiority of imagined love over real love. Or perhaps he thinks that there is no real love: at least, not the kind that fills your heart and soul and transforms your entire world for as long as it lasts. On the other hand, I know from experience that, although imagination is a wonderful thing, you can easily waste away inside of it; and although great adventures and romances, and moments deliciously charged with significance, are possible at any given moment in your mind, living off of them is like eating shadows. It can never compare with the taste of meaningful connections with real people, and the challenging and heart-filling experiences of real life. The problem is that the latter are exponentially harder to come by. But trying to live off dreams alone is a one-way ticket to depression. Your mind will wither away and became stagnant--stupid--one that no longer grows, or changes, or learns, one that ceases to observe the infinite glories and banalities of life. Daydreams, when exploited in excess, are like drugs; it's easy to take a shot of them for a quick-fix, but it's no substitute for real-life joys.
But I'm sure, though Proust claims the imagination's superiority over all and advocates total seclusion as a means of letting your mind flourish, he clearly spent his fair share of time in the real world. How else could he have written all these poignant vignettes at the age of 25, creating human portraits that can pack the significance and subtlety of an entire life into 10 pages? He knew real life, and he understood it better than most. What's so hard for someone like Proust, though, is that having an imagination is so vivid and so wonderful makes it impossible for life to compare with the extraordinary things you create in your head. As Scott Adams once pointed out: "Imagination has a way of breeding disappointment."
There are probably many authors and artists that suffer from the same problem. I imagine that Proust and Jane Austen must have been very much alike, for instance. Both astute observers of human nature, both excellent writers with passionate and vivid imaginations--and yet, in real life, they seemed perpetually dissatisfied with the primary subjects of their writing. Jane Austen created some of the most enduring and beautiful romances of all time which usually culminated in happy and well-suited marriages--somewhat idealized, but not so much as to be unbelievable--and yet Jane Austen herself never married. She died a spinster at the age of 41. Proust also never married (although he was pretty definitely bisexual, so it's hard to say if that had something to do with it). It was not lack of opportunity that prevented either of them from tying the knot. Austen turned down at least one proposal, and Proust, who considered marrying "a very young and delightful girl" that he knew, chose instead to isolate himself and concentrate on his writing.
People like Proust & Austen, who can imagine relationships and experiences that are so real, so detailed, with full-blooded characters of such "imperfect perfection"--how could they ever be satisfied with most of what real life has to offer them? Especially when they consciously place such a high value on their imaginations. For them, it is the source of their creativity, their passion, and their accomplishments, which are dearer to them than any commonplace joys could be. After all, if they had settled for the simple things--marriage, children, the lot, and lived off only "the grass we graze on moment by moment"--then we would not have Pride & Prejudice or A la recherche du temps perdu. For the majority of us who live only partly in our imaginations, in the world of books, stories, and fantasies, then the world would be a much poorer place.
So, I guess, both Proust and I need to clarify what we really mean when we talk about living in dreams. For him, it was a retreat from the real world that he used to better understand it and write stories that help us to better understand it. He didn't live in dreams in the sense that real life and human fulfillment didn't interest him--on the contrary, he lived in dreams where those issues were at the center of everything, and where they could be more clearly illuminated. The dreams that he talked of are the space between life and creation: a gateway between what is and what could be.
But there's a fine line between those dreams and the other kind--the kind that scare me. These kind of dreams are not a gateway; they're closed, cut-off, a place where you go when you don't want to deal with real life. These dreams might make you feel better in the moment, but they don't produce anything meaningful: something that you can share with other people, something that actually brings you back to real life in the end. When you throw away your real life in exchange for the easy rush of imaginary adventures, encounters, and friends, and then you do nothing about it--these are the dreams that are dangerous. Imagination turned to opium.
Some people like to accuse fantasy and romance novelists of being mere escapists who enable other people's escapism. But the fact is, they're producing something that connects thousands or millions of people. Whatever you might think of the intellectual or literary value of things like Twilight or Harry Potter, the fact is, these writers are creating something that can be talked about, thought about, and enjoyed. (Proust wrote an excellent vignette about this very topic, called In Praise of Bad Music; but I won't get into that here). In the end, these dreams do create real-life experiences and real connections between real people. Their creation might be a solitary act, but in the end they are a social phenomenon. And they can be both true and false--like Jane Austen's romances, which are simultaneously full of brilliant observations about people and also an idealized world that we can dare to hope for.
When Proust said, "It is better to dream your life than to live it," he was really just being over-dramatic. Perhaps he himself did not realize the connections he was making--the way that writing simultaneously takes you away from mundane existence and binds you closer to it. Dreams are meant to be at the intersection of observation and creation, and as long as that is the case, then to Proust, Austen, and everyone, I say: dream away!
Sources of inspiration for this post:
Marcel Proust - Pleasures and Days
Claire Herman - Why Did Jane Austen Never Marry?
Encyclopaedia Britannica - Marcel Proust
Scott Adams - The Heady Thrill of Having Nothing to Do
It works both ways: imagination can help one to envision beautiful possibilities, but as you said, it can also cut one off from reality. We can't imagine what we haven't encountered, thought about, heard about, or otherwise experienced. Spend too much time looking inward and one will miss much of what real world can offer – the banal, but also the worthwhile.
ReplyDeleteI wonder about the girl from Proust's story: what other traits, wonderful traits, did she have that the boy was incapable of seeing through the picture he'd painted in his mind?
I wondered that too. I was surprised at the end that she married him anyways. She must've loved him so much in order to do that. If nothing else, we know that she must have been incredibly loyal. Maybe they could've actually been happy together, if the boy had been willing to see her for who she actually was, instead of how he wanted her to be. He clearly suffered from imagination as addiction.
Delete