Sunday, December 9, 2012

The Fundamental Flaw in Ayn Rand’s Philosophy



The Philosophy

Atlas Shrugged is perhaps one of the most compelling books I have ever read.  I read it, just on a whim, when I was in high school, and since then it has stuck with me almost more than any other book.  The power of it lies in the characters, the world, the writing itself, and above all in Rand’s radical theory that being selfish is the only way to be moral.  She believed that, ultimately, doing what’s best for yourself is the best thing you can do, both for yourself and everyone around you.  She was the ultimate rationalist and the ultimate  meritocrat.  She envisioned a society in which the most productive and the most talented always end up on top, simply because they produce what is most useful to society.  Altruism is unnecessary because if people know that they will only receive good things by being a good, productive member of society, then they will shape up and begin making themselves useful to other people—because it is in their own self-interest.  If, on the other hand, they can expect welfare, charity, or any other hand-outs that they did not earn, she believed that society would disintegrate into one where the many take advantage of these hand-outs, while the few noble people continue to work hard because their inner moral strength allows them no other option.  This is the dystopic world that she presents in Atlas Shrugged.   

The Novel

Atlas Shrugged is a beast of a novel—over 1,000 pages long—and it is relentless in its lionizing of the enterprising individual, its paeans to rationalism, and its message that money is the only fair arbiter of the world, and that any government attempt to redistribute money in the name of making things more “fair” is doomed to failure.  As insane as it sounds when I describe it like that, this book completely captivated me from beginning to end.  For well over the first half I was truly fascinated by her ideas, her story, her dystopic world.  It was only as I got towards the end, that a creeping discomfort with her philosophy grew larger and larger in my mind.  By the time I turned the last page, I had figured out why.  

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Men, Women, and Success



I think that there will always be more men than women in prominent positions of power.  I think there will always be more male CEO’s, more male leaders at the head of government, and more men in the really big-buck salary positions. 

I am not saying this because I believe that opportunities for men and women will always be unequal.  I am not saying this because I believe that women will always be the victims of discrimination.  I am certainly not saying this because I believe that women are inferior.  I am saying this because I believe that men and women are inherently different—specifically, that men and women tend to prioritize their lives differently.